EU AI Act: what changes for businesses that use artificial intelligence
The EU AI Act explained for businesses: risk levels, obligations in force, chatbot transparency from 2 August 2026 and new deadlines after the Digital Omnibus.
5 min read
What an AI agent is, how it differs from a chatbot, which SMB processes it can handle and how to introduce it with permissions, controls and costs in check.
An AI agent is software that uses a language model to understand a request and carry it out with real tools: your calendar, CRM, business software, email and phone. Unlike a chatbot, which answers, an agent acts: it books, updates a record, prepares a case file, sends a reminder. That is why it should be designed the way you would plan a new colleague’s access: with permissions, limits and controls.
Italian companies are adopting artificial intelligence faster than before, but they are starting further behind. According to Istat, Italy’s national statistics institute, in 2025 16.4% of companies with at least 10 employees used at least one AI technology, double the 8.2% of 2024. Among small and medium-sized businesses the share was 15.7%, and among large companies 53.1%. Across the European Union, according to Eurostat, the average was 20%.
Agents are the next step on from using AI “as a chat”: instead of asking an assistant something and copying the answer, you hand part of a process over to the AI, with precise rules on what it can do on its own.
| Chatbot | Traditional automation | AI agent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it does | Answers questions | Always runs the same steps | Understands the request and chooses the steps |
| How it decides | It doesn’t decide, it answers | Rules written in advance | Language model plus rules and permissions |
| Handles the unexpected | Barely | No: it stops or gets it wrong | Yes, within set limits |
| When it makes sense | FAQs, information | Identical, high-volume processes | Varied requests to turn into actions |
| Main risk | Wrong answers | Silent errors | Wrong actions if it has too many permissions |
It is not an either-or choice. In real projects all three coexist: deterministic rules where absolute precision is needed, and the agent where a text, a voice or a document has to be understood.
Agents deliver the most where many similar, but not identical, requests come in:
In a platform for property management firms that we developed, for example, the agents propose the actions to take each day, with a confidence score: above the threshold they carry them out; below it, they put them in a review queue. If a piece of data is missing, they ask whoever has it directly.
An agent is made up of five parts:
The most important part is not the model but the quality of the tools and the rules. An agent with clear tools and few permissions makes fewer mistakes than a “brilliant” agent that has been given access to everything.
The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications lists among its main risks prompt injection, meaning malicious instructions hidden in the text the agent reads, and excessive agency, meaning an agent with more permissions than it needs. The defences we use in our projects are simple to explain:
We cover this in detail in our guide to prompt injection and AI agent security.
The cost depends on four factors:
The most prudent way to proceed is to start with a prototype at a clearly defined cost and decide on the rest once you have seen the results.
An AI agent pays off when it turns varied requests into repeatable actions, and it works when it has clear tools, few permissions and a person checking what matters. If you want to find out whether one of your processes is a good candidate, tell us about it: that is always where we start.
No. A well-designed AI agent takes repetitive work off people's plates, such as answering the same questions, entering data or sending reminders. Decisions that matter and uncertain cases stay with people, who receive the work already prepared.
It depends on how many systems it has to use and how ready they are. For a single, well-defined process, a working prototype typically takes a matter of weeks, followed by a run-in period in which the agent works under supervision before it is given more autonomy.
Models from Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI (GPT), Google (Gemini) or open models. It pays to choose them by task: a powerful model for reasoning and planning, a faster and cheaper one for classifying or extracting data.
With the APIs and business plans of the main providers, not by default. You should still check the contract, choose the region where data is processed and send the model only what the task needs.
The EU AI Act explained for businesses: risk levels, obligations in force, chatbot transparency from 2 August 2026 and new deadlines after the Digital Omnibus.
5 min read
How an AI phone assistant works, what it can do for an SMB, which integrations it needs and what to check on quality, privacy and the AI Act.
4 min read
The Digital Omnibus pushes AI Act high-risk obligations back to 2027 and 2028. Prohibitions, transparency and AI literacy remain: here is what to do now.
2 min read